Great post by Pedro Pinheiro about making a business around art. I particularly like this excerpt:
For free? Why?
Because the money to be earned is not on things that can be copied. That’s a lost battle. If you’re a musician, you can make more money on concerts and events. If you’re a photographer, more money can be made by shooting specific assignments for customers, or on photography workshops. If you’re a writer, you can make more money by participating as a speaker at conferences. The era of making something and just making your livelihood from just that is nearing its end. And getting your creations known to the widest possible audience is the key for getting work that can’t be replicated.
Read the original: Pedro Pinheiro: My artist’s manifesto.
Stowe Boyd writes about a possible approach to address different user profiles on different clients. After exposing a possible microformats based approach he talks about a microsyntax solution to the problem:
A microsyntax approach would be something visible in the stream, like including a prefix in front of an @mention or retweet to denote original or desired client:
dabr@pigsonthewing Nice profile!
Here, the implication is that I am referring to Andy’s profile on the Dabr client.
I disagree with the proposed syntax format and propose a new one: @user@client. Here’s my rationale behind it:
- It doesn’t break any functionality (just like the proposed syntax): user will still be able to see this tweet as a mention;
- It adds new functionality: if client is also a twitter user it will also be able to see this tweet as a mention and act upon it, if desired;
- It’s more meaningful than the proposed syntax: you can read it as “user at client”. In the original syntax, saying “client at user” just seems awkward.
Afterthought question: can this microsyntax be expanded to @user@application so that we can finally address any user on any Web application easily. I’m thinking about that.
Read the original post: Twitter URLs: Are Microformats The Answer To A Real Problem? on /Message.