<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Distilled on Bruno Pedro</title><link>https://brunopedro.com/tags/distilled/</link><description>Recent content in Distilled on Bruno Pedro</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 10:00:15 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brunopedro.com/tags/distilled/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>NoSQL Distilled</title><link>https://brunopedro.com/2013/01/20/nosql-distilled/</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:50:10 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brunopedro.com/2013/01/20/nosql-distilled/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0321826620">&lt;img src="http://martinfowler.com/books/nosql.jpg" alt="NoSQL Distilled">&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The term &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL" title="NoSQL">NoSQL&lt;/a>&amp;rdquo; is very ill-defined. It&amp;rsquo;s generally applied to a number of recent nonrelational databases such as &lt;a href="http://cassandra.apache.org/" title="Apache Cassandra">Cassandra&lt;/a>, Mongo, Neo4J, and &lt;a href="http://wiki.basho.com/" title="Riak">Riak&lt;/a>. They embrace schemaless data, run on clusters, and have the ability to trade off traditional consistency for other useful properties. Advocates of NoSQL databases claim that they can build systems that are more performant, scale much better, and are easier to program with. &amp;ndash; &lt;em>&lt;a href="http://martinfowler.com/books/nosql.html" title="NoSQL Distilled">NoSQL Distilled&lt;/a>, by &lt;a href="http://martinfowler.com/" title="Martin Fowler">Martin Fowler&lt;/a>&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>